Age and Gender Related Morphometric Analysis of the Fourth Ventricle Using MRI in Healthy Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study

Age and Gender Differences in the Fourth Ventricle

Authors

  • Amatul Sughra Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Hamdard University, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Maria Mohiuddin Assosiate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Hamdard University, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Hemant Kumar Professor, Department of Anatomy, Hamdard University, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Kelash Kumar Assistant Professor, Department of Radiology, Hamdard University, Karachi, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51846/jucmd.v5i1.4817

Keywords:

Fourth ventricle, Magnetic resonance imaging, Normative reference values, Ventricular morphometry

Abstract

Objective: To analyze age- and gender-related differences in the length and width of the fourth ventricle using MRI in healthy adults in two different age groups.

Methodology: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Anatomy and Radiology of Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, from November 2019 to December 2021. The study was carried out on 206 healthy subjects. divided into two age groups: Group A (20–40 years) and Group B (41-60 years). Both groups included male and female participants with no clinical symptoms or metallic implants. Images were acquired using a thin-slice (1 mm) 3D brain MRI protocol on a 1.5-Tesla scanner (T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and FLAIR sequences). Fourth-ventricle dimensions were measured on axial images using MicroDicom: length was measured craniocaudally at the midline (roof-to-floor), and width was measured transversely at the level of the lateral recesses.

Results: The fourth ventricle was slightly larger in males than in females in both age groups. In Group A (20–40 years), males had a mean length of 14.3 ± 1.16 and width of 13.6 ± 1.36, compared to females (length 13.8 ± 0.91, width 12.9 ± 1.35; p = 0.007). In Group B (41–60 years), males were slightly larger (length 14.7 ± 1.19, width 13.9 ± 1.19) than females (length 14.5 ± 1.02, width 13.6 ± 1.21), without statistical significance. Age-related comparison showed a significant increase in females’ length (p = 0.001) and width (p = 0.005), while males showed no significant change (all values in mm).

Conclusion: The study provides MRI-based normative reference values for fourth-ventricle dimensions in healthy Pakistani adults, demonstrating modest gender differences and age-related enlargement, particularly in females. These population-specific measurements serve as an important baseline for distinguishing normal anatomical variation from pathological ventricular dilation in clinical practice.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

15-01-2026

How to Cite

1.
Amatul Sughra, Maria Mohiuddin, Hemant Kumar, Kelash Kumar. Age and Gender Related Morphometric Analysis of the Fourth Ventricle Using MRI in Healthy Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study: Age and Gender Differences in the Fourth Ventricle. J Univ Coll Med Dent. [Internet]. 2026 Jan. 15 [cited 2026 Mar. 29];5(1):33-8. Available from: https://testjournals.uol.edu.pk/index.php/jucmd/article/view/4817

Issue

Volume 5 Issue 1

Section

Original Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Amatul Sughra, Maria Mohiuddin, Hemant Kumar, Kelash Kumar

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, in a journal or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process.