Subthalamotomy versus Pallidotomy for Parkinsonian Rigidity: A Quasi-Experimental Study in a Resource Limited Tertiary Center

Pallidotomy vs Subthalamotomy in Parkinson’s Disease

Authors

  • Omair Afzal Ali Assistant Professor, Neurosurgery unit II, Punjab institute of Neurosciences, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Usman Ahmad Associate Professor, Neurosurgery unit II, Punjab institute of Neurosciences, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Rizwan Ahmad Khan Senior Registrar, Department of Neurosurgery unit II, Punjab Institute of Neurosciences, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore,Pakistan
  • Anosh John House Officer, Neurosurgery unit II, Punjab institute of Neurosciences, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Shahzad Hussain Shah Professor, Neurosurgery unit II, Punjab institute of Neurosciences, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Khalid Mehmood Professor, Neurosurgery unit II, Punjab institute of Neurosciences, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51846/jucmd.v5i1.4771

Keywords:

Parkinson’s disease, Pallidotomy, Subthalamotomy, STN lesioning, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale

Abstract

Objective: To compare motor outcomes and postoperative complications of subthalamotomy versus pallidotomy for Parkinsonian rigidity in a resource-limited setting where deep-brain stimulation is not affordable.

Methodology: This quasi-experimental study was carried out at the Department of Neurosurgery, Punjab Institute of Neurosciences, Lahore, from 2016 to 2021. Forty patients with Parkinson’s disease were included. Twenty patients underwent pallidotomy, in which a small, precisely targeted lesion was made in the globus pallidus region of the brain, and twenty had a subthalamotomy, involving a lesion in the subthalamic nucleus. Each patient’s motor function was assessed before surgery and at regular follow-ups using the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III, a standard measure of movement difficulty in Parkinson’s disease. Postoperative complications were also recorded. The changes in UPDRS scores and complications were compared within and between groups.

Results: The mean age was 47.6 ± 8.7 years, and 85% of patients were male. Both procedures produced significant postoperative improvement in motor scores (p < 0.001). In the pallidotomy group, the UPDRS Part III score improved from 24.9 ± 1.47 to 10.47 ± 0.86 (42% improvement), and in the subthalamotomy group from 25.48 ± 1.55 to 10.26 ± 1.18 (40.2% improvement). Although pallidotomy showed a slightly greater numerical reduction in UPDRS scores, the difference between groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Complications were less frequent after pallidotomy (10%) compared with subthalamotomy (35%), but this difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: Both procedures are effective in treating Parkinsonian rigidity. No statistically significant difference was observed between the two procedures in terms of relief of symptoms. Fewer complications were associated with pallidotomies as compared with subthalamotomies.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

15-01-2026

How to Cite

1.
Afzal Ali O, Ahmad U, Ahmad Khan R, John A, Hussain Shah S, Mehmood K. Subthalamotomy versus Pallidotomy for Parkinsonian Rigidity: A Quasi-Experimental Study in a Resource Limited Tertiary Center: Pallidotomy vs Subthalamotomy in Parkinson’s Disease. J Univ Coll Med Dent. [Internet]. 2026 Jan. 15 [cited 2026 Mar. 29];5(1):52-7. Available from: https://testjournals.uol.edu.pk/index.php/jucmd/article/view/4771

Issue

Section

Original Articles