Evaluating Communication Practices between Dentists and Dental Technicians

Authors

  • Hammad Hassan Assistant Professor, Science of Dental Materials, University of Health Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Hassan Tariq Demonstrator and Dental Technologist, FMH Institute of Allied Health Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Aneela Qaisar Associate Professor, Science of Dental Materials, FMH College of Dentistry, Lahore. Pakistan
  • Muhammad Imran Ameer Malik Demonstrator, Science of Dental Materials, de’ Montmorency College of Dentistry, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Aamir Rafique Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, de’ Montmorency College of Dentistry, Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51846/jucmd.v4i1.3474

Keywords:

Communication, Dentist, Dental technicians, Prescription card

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of current communication practices and the understanding of technicians regarding written prescriptions.

Methodology: This Questionnaire based cross-sectional study was conducted in Lahore, from Aug 2023 to May 2024, to assess communication quality between dentists and dental technicians. The sample consisted of 50 dental technicians currently employed in ten different private and public dental laboratories in Lahore, Punjab. The selection of participants was carried out using non-probability convenient sampling. Undergraduate students pursuing dental technology were excluded from the study to maintain a focus on experienced professionals who actively participate in dental restoration processes. Data were collected using a modified standardized questionnaire, including items on demographics and communication quality. Data was collected, reviewed for completeness, and analyzed using SPSS v24.

Results: Most dental technicians (n=38, 68%) possess a BSc degree in dental technology with work experience ranging from 1 to 45 years. Communication preferences varied notably across workplace settings. About 46% (n=23) of the technician favored direct communication. There was a significant difference in communication modes between these settings (p=0.001), with a preference for personal visits, particularly among technicians from teaching institutes (n=23, 88.5%). The majority (n=42, 84%) reported positive receptivity from dentists, and 62% (n=31) indicated that communication was encouraged, particularly in teaching institutes. Issues regarding blank prescription cards were mixed, with 36% (n=18) never receiving them and 50% (n=25) consulting clinicians in such cases. Only 36% (n=18) of technicians felt they received sufficient information.

Conclusion: Most technicians prefer direct communication from dentists, particularly in teaching institutes, compared to those in commercial labs who favor phone calls. A major concern was the lack of sufficient information and blank patient prescriptions from dentists. Addressing these gaps through standardized protocols, modern digital tools, and enhanced training can improve patient outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

15-12-2024

How to Cite

1.
Hassan H, Hassan Tariq, Aneela Qaisar, Muhammad Imran Ameer Malik, Aamir Rafique. Evaluating Communication Practices between Dentists and Dental Technicians. J Univ Coll Med Dent. [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 15 [cited 2026 Mar. 29];4(1):50-4. Available from: https://testjournals.uol.edu.pk/index.php/jucmd/article/view/3474

Issue

Volume 4 Issue 1

Section

Original Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Hammad Hassan, Hassan Tariq, Aneela Qaisar, Muhammad Imran Ameer Malik, Aamir Rafique

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, in a journal or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process.